and Fu, Q., “ The Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Dynamic Packing Injection Molded PP/PS Blends”, Polymer, 44, 1469– 1480 ( 2003) 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00011-9 Search in Google Scholar I.: Engineering Rheology, OUP Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom ( 2000) Search in Google Scholar Schulz, H., “ Characteristics of Modern Manufacturing Techniques”, AMST’05 Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 5–15 ( 2005) PMid:16230743 10.1007/3-1_2 Search in Google Scholar and Holzer, C., “ Presentation of a Novel Sensor Based on Acoustic Emission in Injection Molding”, J. Müller, F., Rath, G., Lucyshyn, T., Kukla, C., Burgsteiner, M. P., “ Validation of an Analytical Method to Estimate the Bulk Melt Temperature from In-Mold Temperature Data”, Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Conference ANTEC, 1591965 ( 2013), Search in Google Scholar W., “ Process Parameter Control: The Key to Optimization”, Plast.

I.: Rheology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, William Andrew, Norwich, New York, USA ( 2005) Search in Google Scholar Kirby, B.: Micro-and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom ( 2010) 10.1017/CBO9780511760723 Search in Google Scholar and Fan, Z., “ Feasibility Analysis of an In-mold Multivariate Sensor”, Int. Kazmer, D.: Injection Mold Design Engineering, Hanser Gardner, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA ( 2007) PMid:17187222 10.3139/9783446434196 Search in Google Scholar McGraw-Hill Education, New York City, New York, USA ( 1967) Search in Google Scholar and Mélé, P., “ Microinjection Molding of Thermoplastic Polymers: A Review”, J. P., “ Control of Plastic Melt Temperature: A Multiple Input Multiple Output Model Predictive Approach”, Polym. Part I: Modeling and Identification”, Polym. G., “ Temperature Control of Injection Molding. M., “ Rheology of Non-Newtonian Fluids: A New Flow Equation for Pseudoplastic Systems”, J. G., “ Towards Intelligent Process Control of Injection Moulding of Polymers”, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 209, 357– 367 ( 1995) 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_095_02 Search in Google ScholarĬross, M. and Pecht, M., “ Injection-Molding Process Control–A Review”, Polym. The apparent melt viscosity estimated by the MVS are close to those predicted by the Cross-WLF model, exhibiting appropriate shear thinning but behavior but inconsistent temperature dependence.Īeppel, T., “ Workers Not Included”, The Wall Street Journal, B1 ( 2002) Search in Google ScholarĪgrawal, A., Pandelidis, I. The accuracy of the melt velocity estimations depended on the ram velocity set-point, yielding a coefficient of determination of 0.91 for the lower ram velocities, and reaching saturation for melt velocities about 450 mm/s. The results show that the MVS provides excellent measurement of melt temperature and pressure. A 12-run, blocked half-fractional design of experiments (DOE) was run to characterize the effect of melt temperature, mold temperature, packing pressure, and ram velocity. The response of the MVS is analyzed using an instrumented mold including piezoelectric pressure sensors, an infrared pyrometer, and thermocouples. The apparent melt viscosity is then derived based on the melt velocity and the time derivative of the increasing melt pressure. Melt velocity is derived from the initial response of the melt temperature as the polymer melt flows across the sensor lens. Melt pressure and temperature are respectively obtained through the incorporation of a piezo-ceramic element and infrared thermopile. A multivariate sensor (MVS) is described for measurement of melt temperature, melt pressure, melt velocity, and melt viscosity.

Ram pressure velocity